V Subrahmanian, Friday, February 12, 2016 12:41 pm

The Sūtasamhitā – Part 9

Part 9

That the consumed food is what is responsible for the growth of the body, etc. is stated by means of an analogy:

Verse 66:

मृदम्भसा यथा भित्तिर्निर्मिता वै मृदम्भसा ।
आप्यायते तथा भुक्तैर्भूतैर्देहादयोऽपि च ॥ ६६॥

मृदम्भसा by clay and water यथा just as भित्तिः a wall निर्मिता is built वै indeed मृदम्भसा by clay and water 
आप्यायते abounds in size तथा even so भुक्तैः by the consumed  भूतैः elements देहादयः body, etc.  अपि also च too 

When water is added to clay and a wall is built, we see that the increase in the quantity of the mixture results in the increase of the thickness of the wall. The increase in size, bulging, by intake of food is known from perceiving the body aggregate.  That is why the creation of the body aggregate is stated to be by food, etc. When sufficient food is taken in there is growth and maintenance of the body aggregate. In the absence of intake, one can easily perceive the decay or decrease in the parameters of the body aggregate. 

Verse 67:

अतो देहादिसंघातेऽहंममेत्यादिकां मतिम् ।
विसृज्य साक्षिचैतन्ये विद्वान्कुर्यादहंमतिम् ॥ ६७॥

अतः therefore देहादिसंघाते in the group of body, etc. अहं मम इत्यादिकां ‘I’, ‘mine’ etc. मतिम् thought विसृज्य giving up साक्षिचैतन्ये in the witness consciousness विद्वान् the informed one कुर्यात् entertain अहंमतिम् the ‘I’ identification.  

Since the body-mind complex is a product of the elements, a discriminating person should give up the identification with the inert entity and claim his identity with his true self that is consciousness and the witness of the inert world of body, objects of desire, etc. It is quite natural, without being taught by anyone, for a person to take the body-mind complex to be the self. It is this error that is called aham-adhyāsa, the superimposition of the ‘I’ in the body, etc. It is this adhyāsa that leads to mama-adhyāsa, identification with what is considered as ‘mine’, that is samsāra, bondage. The remedy to this situation is to give up the ‘I’ identification with the not-self and realize oneself as the Self that is the witness of the entire gamut of not-self consisting of the body-mind and the external world of objects. While the body-mind complex is a group of manifoldness, the Self is singular, unitary. Manifoldness is the product of māyā, prakṛti and unitariness is not a product at all; it is Consciousness, never produced and never destroyed. It is the aim of the Veda to bring the aspirant to the discriminative insight where he gives up his identification with the inert body-mind and realizes his true identity as the Self, the Ātman, verily Consciousness. 

The mind-body complex of living beings is certainly quite distinct from the elements. How then can there be a cause-effect relationship between the elements and the mind, body, etc.?  

Verse 68:

दध्नः सर्पिर्यथा जातं मन्थनेन सुरर्षभाः ।
तथा बुद्ध्यादयो भावा भूतेभ्यश्चोद्भवन्ति हि ॥ ६८॥

दध्नः from curds सर्पिः ghee यथा just as जातं comes out मन्थनेन by churning सुरर्षभाः O Gods! तथा so too बुद्ध्यादयः intellect, etc. भावाः effects भूतेभ्यः from elements च too उद्भवन्ति emerge हि indeed

The passage from the Chāndogya Upaniṣad (6.6.1) दध्नः सोम्य मथ्यमानस्य योऽणिमा स ऊर्ध्वः समुदीषति तत्सर्पिर्भवति [‘From curds, O dear, upon churning, emerges its subtle content which becomes clarified butter (ghee)’] gives the analogy of ghee, the effect, emerging from the curds, the cause, owing to the act of churning. At first sight, it would be difficult to appreciate the cause-effect relationship here. This is because the ghee and the curds are quite distinct from each other. Yet, upon analyzing the phenomenon, one can clearly know that the process of churning brings out the subtle, unseen, ghee (through the butter that is first extracted). The analogy is to explain the transformation of the elements – fire, water and earth – through the process of cooking in the fire of the stomach, into body, the sense / motor organs, the mind and intellect. The idea is that food consumed has the elements in it and upon their being processed within the stomach, the body, organs, mind, etc. are nourished. In the absence of food the body, etc. emaciate and finally die. The sustenance of the body metabolism is dependent on food that is itself a transformation of the elements. 

Verse 69:

भौतिकं देहसंघातं विसृज्य मतिमान्पुनः ।
सर्वसाक्षिणि चिद्रूपे कुर्यान्नित्यमहंमतिम् ॥ ६९॥

भौतिकं elemental देहसंघातं body aggregate विसृज्य giving up मतिमान् informed one पुनः again सर्वसाक्षिणि in the universal-Witnessचिद्रूपे consciousness कुर्यात् let have नित्यम् always अहंमतिम् the ‘I’-perception 

By the analogy of curds-ghee the Upaniṣad establishes that the body aggregate is the product of elements, bhautikam. The unmistakable message thus conveyed is that an aspirant after truth has to shift his identification with the body, etc. on to the Self, the Ātman, the Consciousness. It is only the erroneous identification, nay, admixture, of the conscious self with the inert object that brings forth the phenomenon of samsāra, bondage. The Consciousness, Ātman, is caught up, as it were, in the cage of the body-mind complex. The afflictions of the material body, mind etc. are wrongly taken to be of the Self and so continues the transmigratory life. The end to such a perpetual samsāra comes with the discriminating insight that the Self is ever separate from the body aggregate. Once this occurs and firms up, there will be no seed of ignorance that can sprout into the next embodied life. It is freedom from embodied life that is called mokṣa, liberation. The avowed object of the Veda is to enable the human to attain this.

Verse 70:

अन्नेनाऽऽप्यायतेऽभुक्ते नाधीतं तस्य भासते ।
ततोऽपि बुद्धिरन्नस्य कार्यमेव न संशयः ॥ ७०॥

अन्नेन by food आप्यायते transforms अभुक्ते when not eaten न not अधीतं learned तस्य his भासते recalled ततः therefore अपि too बुद्धिः intellect अन्नस्य of food कार्यं effect एव alone न no संशयः doubt

Let the organ of speech and the prāṇa be effects of food (through the elements), why should one hold the mind to be an effect too? After all, the vaiśeṣika doctrine holds the mind to be an eternal entity. When the aspirant-son Śvetaketu questioned his preceptor-father Uddālaka on this and pleaded for further explanation, the father compassionately subjected the boy to a physical test with the intention of demonstrating his point: षोडशकलः सोम्य पुरुषः पञ्चदशाहानि माशीः काममपः पिबापोमयः प्राणो नपिबतो विच्छेत्स्यत इति (6.7.1) [“A person, my dear, consists of sixteen parts. Do not eat any food for fifteen days, but drink as much water as you like.  Since the prāṇa consists of water, it will not be cut off if you drink water.”]

When the boy refrained from eating food for fifteen days, the mind faculty weakened due to which he could not recall the Veda that he had memorized. Upon resuming intake of food, the mind grew in strength and he could recollect what he had committed to memory. From this it became clear that food has its effect on the mind’s faculties. The word ‘buddhi’ (intellect) is considered non-different from ‘manas’ (mind).    

Verse 71:

अतोऽपि बुद्धिमन्नस्य कार्यं त्यक्त्वा विविक्तधीः ।
सर्वसाक्षिणि चिद्रूपे कुर्यान्नित्यमहंमतिम् ॥ ७१॥

अतः therefore अपि too बुद्धिम् intellect  अन्नस्य of food कार्यं effect त्यक्त्वा giving up विविक्तधीः discriminative mind सर्वसाक्षिणि in the universal-witness चिद्रूपे consciousness कुर्यात् establish नित्यम् always अहंमतिम् the I-consciousness

What was said earlier with regard to the gross body (in verse 69) that it is the non-Ātman is applicable here, in the case of the mind as well. Just as one should repose identity in his true Self, the Consciousness, since the body is not the self, so too one has to repeatedly disassociate from the mind/intellect, since it is not the self, and fix one’s identity in the true self, the consciousness that is the witness of the mind and the body. In fact the very first verse of the 13th chapter of the Bhagavadgītā is this lesson: The body, etc. is the object to the Consciousness that is the witness, knower, of it. The seer-seen distinction helps the aspirant to learn to claim his true self, the conscious witness, and disown the inert witnessed body-mind world of duality. A firm conviction in this discrimination, says the very 13th chapter of the  Bhagavdgītā, at the end, leads to liberation. 

Verse 72:

देहेन्द्रियादिसंघातेऽहंममेत्यादिकां मतिम् ।
त्यक्त्वा स्वात्मनि चिद्रूपे यदाऽपीतो भवत्ययम् ॥ ७२॥

देहेन्द्रियादिसंघाते In the body, organs aggregate अहंममेत्यादिकां ‘I’, ‘mine’ etc. मतिम् identification त्यक्त्वा giving up स्वात्मनि in one’s self चिद्रूपे consciousness यदा when अपीतो resolved भवति is अयम् he

तदा स्वपिति दुःखादिदर्शनं च न विद्यते ।
स्वात्मरूपसुखप्राप्तिरेवं दृष्टाऽस्य देहिनः ॥ ७३॥

तदा then स्वपिति he sleeps दुःखादिदर्शनं perception of misery, etc. च too न not विद्यते exists स्वात्मरूपसुखप्राप्तिः attainment of one’s native bliss एवं thus दृष्टा seen अस्य of this देहिनः jīva

अतोऽपि मतिमान्नित्यं त्यक्त्वा देहादिगां धियम् ।
सर्वसाक्षिणि चिद्रूपे साक्षात्कुर्यादहंमतिम् ॥ ७४॥

अतः therefore अपि too मतिमान् a discriminating one नित्यं always त्यक्त्वा giving up देहादिगां body, etc.-specific धियम् identification सर्वसाक्षिणि in universal-witness चिद्रूपे Consciousness साक्षात् directly कुर्यात् identify अहंमतिम् the ‘I’ thought

(Coming soon…Part 10)

Share on Facebook0Share on LinkedIn0Tweet about this on Twitter0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Google+0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent articles